Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Keyword substitution: kv
Default branch: MAIN
lint: warn about extern declarations outside headers https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2023/03/15/msg013727.html
lint: add quotes around placeholders for the remaining messages Reword some of the messages slightly, exchanging brevity for clarity. Message 138 is kept as-is, as it is not yet covered by any tests. Message 240 is kep as-is, as it is unreachable.
tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
tests/lint: keep messages in test files in sync with actual messages Each of the tests named msg_*.c repeats the template of the message, to make the test somewhat self-contained when viewed in isolation. This creates a redundancy, and keeping track of this manually is next to impossible. I tried it and failed in 9 cases, even though it has just been 2 months since I myself created the initial files and I knew all the time that this redundancy exists. Be fool-proof for the future by checking this automatically.
tests/lint: add more tests for enum mismatch
lint: add expections to tests msg_098: fix suffix for floating point constant msg_127: remove prototype msg_146: fix return type
lint: add tests for several messages
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1 Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover previously unknown bugs in lint. The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or edge cases, keeping them away from the source code. The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated. When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect. It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test cases as well.