CVS log for src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_069.c

Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1

Request diff between arbitrary revisions

Default branch: MAIN

Revision 1.5 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Mar 28 14:44:34 2023 UTC (12 months, 3 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
Changes since 1.4: +3 -1 lines
Diff to previous 1.4 (colored)

lint: warn about extern declarations outside headers

https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2023/03/15/msg013727.html

Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [selected], Fri Jun 17 18:54:53 2022 UTC (22 months ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: netbsd-10-base, netbsd-10-0-RELEASE, netbsd-10-0-RC6, netbsd-10-0-RC5, netbsd-10-0-RC4, netbsd-10-0-RC3, netbsd-10-0-RC2, netbsd-10-0-RC1, netbsd-10
Changes since 1.3: +3 -3 lines
Diff to previous 1.3 (colored)

tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter

Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied
if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint.
This meant that the prefix 'error:' or 'warning:' could be omitted from
the 'expect' comment.  These omissions were hard to see in a manual
review.  Now any omissions must be visually marked with '...'.

The test msg_342 now reports its messages properly as being in the file
msg_342.c, rather than msg_341.c.  This had been a copy-and-paste
mistake.

Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Apr 8 21:29:29 2022 UTC (2 years ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.2: +8 -3 lines
Diff to previous 1.2 (colored) to selected 1.4 (colored)

lint: remove unused message 70, add some more tests

Revision 1.2 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021 UTC (3 years, 1 month ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: cjep_sun2x-base1, cjep_sun2x-base, cjep_sun2x, cjep_staticlib_x-base1, cjep_staticlib_x-base, cjep_staticlib_x
Changes since 1.1: +2 -2 lines
Diff to previous 1.1 (colored) to selected 1.4 (colored)

lint: force each test to declare the expected diagnostics

By listing the expected diagnostics directly at the code that triggers
the diagnostics, it is easier to cross-check whether the diagnostics
make sense.

No functional change to lint itself.

Revision 1.1 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sat Jan 2 10:22:43 2021 UTC (3 years, 3 months ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Diff to selected 1.4 (colored)

lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1

Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality.  Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.

The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so.  Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.

The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh.  All other files are just auto-generated.

When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case.  Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many.  The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.

This form allows you to request diff's between any two revisions of a file. You may select a symbolic revision name using the selection box or you may type in a numeric name using the type-in text box.