Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Default branch: MAIN
Revision 1.6 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Mon Jun 20 21:13:36 2022 UTC (7 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
CVS Tags: netbsd-10-base, netbsd-10, HEAD
Changes since 1.5: +3 -3 lines
Diff to previous 1.5 (colored)
lint: add quotes around several placeholders in messages
Revision 1.5 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Jun 17 18:54:53 2022 UTC (7 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Changes since 1.4: +2 -2 lines
Diff to previous 1.4 (colored)
tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint. This meant that the prefix 'error:' or 'warning:' could be omitted from the 'expect' comment. These omissions were hard to see in a manual review. Now any omissions must be visually marked with '...'. The test msg_342 now reports its messages properly as being in the file msg_342.c, rather than msg_341.c. This had been a copy-and-paste mistake.
Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Apr 8 21:48:19 2022 UTC (9 months, 3 weeks ago) by rillig
Changes since 1.3: +5 -7 lines
Diff to previous 1.3 (colored)
lint: fix undefined behavior on enum overflow (since 1995) GCC had optimized the check away, due to the obvious integer overflow 'x - 1 == INT_MAX'. To prevent further bugs like this, compile with -ftrapv.
Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Apr 8 21:29:29 2022 UTC (9 months, 3 weeks ago) by rillig
Changes since 1.2: +18 -1 lines
Diff to previous 1.2 (colored)
lint: remove unused message 70, add some more tests
Revision 1.2 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Feb 21 09:07:58 2021 UTC (23 months, 1 week ago) by rillig
CVS Tags: cjep_sun2x-base1, cjep_sun2x-base, cjep_sun2x, cjep_staticlib_x-base1, cjep_staticlib_x-base, cjep_staticlib_x
Changes since 1.1: +2 -2 lines
Diff to previous 1.1 (colored)
lint: force each test to declare the expected diagnostics By listing the expected diagnostics directly at the code that triggers the diagnostics, it is easier to cross-check whether the diagnostics make sense. No functional change to lint itself.
Revision 1.1 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sat Jan 2 10:22:43 2021 UTC (2 years, 1 month ago) by rillig
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1 Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover previously unknown bugs in lint. The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or edge cases, keeping them away from the source code. The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated. When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect. It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test cases as well.
This form allows you to request diff's between any two revisions of a file. You may select a symbolic revision name using the selection box or you may type in a numeric name using the type-in text box.