CVS log for src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/Attic/msg_101.exp
![[BACK]](/icons/back.gif)
Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Keyword substitution: kv
Default branch: MAIN
Revision 1.9
Fri Jun 17 20:23:59 2022 UTC (2 years, 7 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
CVS tags: perseant-exfatfs-base-20240630,
perseant-exfatfs-base,
perseant-exfatfs,
HEAD
FILE REMOVED
Changes since revision 1.8: +0 -0
lines
tests/lint: remove .exp files, as they have become redundant
Now that each lint1 test lists all generated diagnostics as 'expect'
comments, the information from the .exp files is no longer needed. The
only information that gets lost is the order of the diagnostics, which
is mostly relevant for paired messages like 'inconsistent definition' +
'previous definition was here'.
Revision 1.8: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Sun Jul 4 17:28:06 2021 UTC (3 years, 6 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.7: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.7: +1 -1
lines
lint: replace wrong assumption with citation from C99
No functional change.
Revision 1.7: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Sun Jul 4 17:01:58 2021 UTC (3 years, 6 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.6: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.6: +4 -4
lines
lint: align messages for invalid left operand of '.' or '->'
Revision 1.6: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Wed Jun 30 14:11:08 2021 UTC (3 years, 6 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.5: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.5: +6 -6
lines
lint: fix type name in message 101 for wrong member name
Revision 1.5: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Wed Jun 30 14:02:11 2021 UTC (3 years, 6 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.4: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.4: +6 -1
lines
tests/lint: extend tests for message 101
This demonstrates the wrong type name in the message.
Revision 1.4: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Tue Mar 30 15:18:19 2021 UTC (3 years, 9 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
CVS tags: cjep_sun2x-base1,
cjep_sun2x-base,
cjep_sun2x,
cjep_staticlib_x-base1,
cjep_staticlib_x-base,
cjep_staticlib_x
Diff to: previous 1.3: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.3: +1 -1
lines
lint: add type information for message about unknown member name
Revision 1.3: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Sun Mar 21 20:44:59 2021 UTC (3 years, 9 months ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.2: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.2: +1 -1
lines
lint: prefix error messages with 'error:'
This makes it easier to find these errors in the build logs.
Revision 1.2: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Fri Jan 8 21:25:03 2021 UTC (4 years ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
Diff to: previous 1.1: preferred, colored
Changes since revision 1.1: +1 -1
lines
lint: add tests for several messages
Revision 1.1: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs
Sat Jan 2 10:22:43 2021 UTC (4 years ago) by rillig
Branches: MAIN
lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't
break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover
previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and
they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test
leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or
edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and
t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a
single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each
test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon
as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too
many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect.
It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test
cases as well.
CVSweb <webmaster@jp.NetBSD.org>