![[BACK]](/icons/back.gif){kind=icon}
Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Default branch: MAIN
Revision 1.8, Fri Jun 17 20:23:58 2022 UTC (7 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
Changes since 1.7: +0 -0
lines
FILE REMOVED
tests/lint: remove .exp files, as they have become redundant Now that each lint1 test lists all generated diagnostics as 'expect' comments, the information from the .exp files is no longer needed. The only information that gets lost is the order of the diagnostics, which is mostly relevant for paired messages like 'inconsistent definition' + 'previous definition was here'.
Revision 1.7 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Apr 19 23:16:14 2022 UTC (9 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.6: +1 -0
lines
Diff to previous 1.6 (colored)
lint: fix integer overflow on seeing -(uint64_t)INT64_MIN Seen in external/cddl/osnet/dist/lib/libuutil/common/uu_strtoint.c, which is protected by a NOLINT in ../Makefile.inc.
Revision 1.6 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Apr 15 21:50:07 2022 UTC (9 months, 3 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.5: +33 -52
lines
Diff to previous 1.5 (colored)
lint: in C99 mode, do not warn about non-prototype conversions Message 259 is "argument #%d is converted from '%s' to '%s' due to prototype", and it is intended to warn about compatibility between traditional C where functions had no prototypes and standard C where functions have prototypes. Running lint in C99 mode is further away from traditional C than running lint in C90 mode, so that warning doesn't make sense for C99. There are still some inconsistencies in the 5 language version modes that lint offers: -t for traditional C (no option) for migrating traditional C to C90 -s for C90 code -S for C99 code -Ac11 for C11 code By disabling warning 259 in C99 mode, a typical NetBSD build produces 14.500 fewer warnings than before, of about 100.000 total. Message 259 overlaps with message 298 "conversion from '%s' to '%s' may lose accuracy, arg #%d", and in some cases of potentially lossy conversions, lint now produces none of these messages. In some other cases, these warnings were reported redundantly. The cases where message 298 makes sense will be added back later, as needed.
Revision 1.5 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Mon Aug 23 06:50:01 2021 UTC (17 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.4: +14 -14
lines
Diff to previous 1.4 (colored)
lint: add quotes around placeholder in message 141
Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Aug 22 21:17:04 2021 UTC (17 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.3: +0 -1
lines
Diff to previous 1.3 (colored)
lint: fix folding of comparisons in constant expressions
Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Aug 22 20:14:24 2021 UTC (17 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.2: +1 -0
lines
Diff to previous 1.2 (colored)
tests/lint: demonstrate wrong folding of 64-bit numbers
Revision 1.2 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Aug 19 20:48:47 2021 UTC (17 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.1: +0 -2
lines
Diff to previous 1.1 (colored)
lint: fix wrong integer overflow warning for unsigned types
Revision 1.1 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Aug 19 20:32:33 2021 UTC (17 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
tests/lint: test folding of constant expressions Since November 2001, there is a comment above the function 'fold' that suggests there are a few bugs concerning overflow detection. Add some first 'proper regression tests' to prove these bugs.