Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / xlint / lint1
Request diff between arbitrary revisions
Default branch: MAIN
Revision 1.5, Fri Jun 17 20:23:58 2022 UTC (7 months, 1 week ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
Changes since 1.4: +0 -0
lines
FILE REMOVED
tests/lint: remove .exp files, as they have become redundant Now that each lint1 test lists all generated diagnostics as 'expect' comments, the information from the .exp files is no longer needed. The only information that gets lost is the order of the diagnostics, which is mostly relevant for paired messages like 'inconsistent definition' + 'previous definition was here'.
Revision 1.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sat Jun 11 11:52:13 2022 UTC (7 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.3: +1 -1
lines
Diff to previous 1.3 (colored)
lint: add quotes around a few more placeholders in messages
Revision 1.3 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Apr 24 19:21:01 2022 UTC (9 months ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.2: +1 -0
lines
Diff to previous 1.2 (colored)
lint: error out on missing type in declarations
Revision 1.2 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sat Jan 15 14:22:03 2022 UTC (12 months, 2 weeks ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.1: +3 -3
lines
Diff to previous 1.1 (colored)
tests/lint: expect complete messages in feature tests Previously, the tests contained many comments like /* expect: 123 */, which were useless to a casual reader since nobody is expected to learn lint's message IDs by heart. Replace these with the complete diagnostics, to show what lint is complaining about. The tests named msg_*.c have been left unmodified since they mention the full message text in their header comment. No functional change.
Revision 1.1 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Apr 18 20:02:56 2021 UTC (21 months, 1 week ago) by rillig
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: cjep_sun2x-base1,
cjep_sun2x-base,
cjep_sun2x,
cjep_staticlib_x-base1,
cjep_staticlib_x-base,
cjep_staticlib_x
lint: test emitting of symbol information in the .ln files Even though the new test is quite large, it didn't find any bugs in the code. The only thing I'm unsure about is why static functions are exported as well, since they are supposed to be local to the translation unit.