[BACK]Return to opt_eei.c CVS log [TXT][DIR] Up to [cvs.NetBSD.org] / src / tests / usr.bin / indent

Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the copyright notices on the relevant files.

Diff for /src/tests/usr.bin/indent/opt_eei.c between version 1.7 and 1.8

version 1.7, 2022/04/22 21:21:20 version 1.8, 2022/04/24 09:04:12
Line 11 
Line 11 
  * continued statements.   * continued statements.
  */   */
   
 #indent input  //indent input
 bool  bool
 less(int a, int b)  less(int a, int b)
 {  {
Line 23  less(int a, int b)
Line 23  less(int a, int b)
             b)              b)
                 return true;                  return true;
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 #indent run -eei  //indent run -eei
 bool  bool
 less(int a, int b)  less(int a, int b)
 {  {
Line 37  less(int a, int b)
Line 37  less(int a, int b)
                         b)                          b)
                 return true;                  return true;
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 #indent run-equals-input -neei  //indent run-equals-input -neei
   
 /*  /*
  * When a single indentation level is the same as the continuation   * When a single indentation level is the same as the continuation
  * indentation, the code does not clearly show whether the 'b' belongs to the   * indentation, the code does not clearly show whether the 'b' belongs to the
  * condition or the body statement.   * condition or the body statement.
  */   */
 #indent run -neei -i4  //indent run -neei -i4
 bool  bool
 less(int a, int b)  less(int a, int b)
 {  {
Line 58  less(int a, int b)
Line 58  less(int a, int b)
         b)          b)
         return true;          return true;
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 /*  /*
  * Adding the extra level of indentation is useful when the standard   * Adding the extra level of indentation is useful when the standard
Line 66  less(int a, int b)
Line 66  less(int a, int b)
  * such a case, the continued condition would have the same indentation as the   * such a case, the continued condition would have the same indentation as the
  * following statement, which would be confusing.   * following statement, which would be confusing.
  */   */
 #indent run -eei -i4  //indent run -eei -i4
 bool  bool
 less(int a, int b)  less(int a, int b)
 {  {
Line 78  less(int a, int b)
Line 78  less(int a, int b)
             b)              b)
         return true;          return true;
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 /*  /*
  * With an indentation size of 4, the width of the code 'if (' is exactly one   * With an indentation size of 4, the width of the code 'if (' is exactly one
Line 87  less(int a, int b)
Line 87  less(int a, int b)
  * XXX: This is unexpected since this creates the exact ambiguity that the   * XXX: This is unexpected since this creates the exact ambiguity that the
  * option '-eei' is supposed to prevent.   * option '-eei' is supposed to prevent.
  */   */
 #indent run -eei -i4 -nlp  //indent run -eei -i4 -nlp
 bool  bool
 less(int a, int b)  less(int a, int b)
 {  {
Line 99  less(int a, int b)
Line 99  less(int a, int b)
         b)          b)
         return true;          return true;
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
   
 /*  /*
Line 107  less(int a, int b)
Line 107  less(int a, int b)
  * with a word or an operator like '&&'. The latter cannot start a statement,   * with a word or an operator like '&&'. The latter cannot start a statement,
  * so there would be no ambiguity.   * so there would be no ambiguity.
  */   */
 #indent input  //indent input
 {  {
         if (a          if (a
 && b)  && b)
             stmt();              stmt();
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 /*  /*
  * XXX: The extra indentation is unnecessary since there is no possible   * XXX: The extra indentation is unnecessary since there is no possible
  * confusion: the standard indentation is 8, the indentation of the continued   * confusion: the standard indentation is 8, the indentation of the continued
  * condition could have stayed at 4.   * condition could have stayed at 4.
  */   */
 #indent run -eei  //indent run -eei
 {  {
         if (a          if (a
                         && b)                          && b)
                 stmt();                  stmt();
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 /*  /*
  * The extra indentation is necessary here since otherwise the '&&' and the   * The extra indentation is necessary here since otherwise the '&&' and the
  * 'stmt()' would start at the same indentation.   * 'stmt()' would start at the same indentation.
  */   */
 #indent run -eei -i4  //indent run -eei -i4
 {  {
     if (a      if (a
             && b)              && b)
         stmt();          stmt();
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
   
 /*  /*
  * With an indentation size of 4, the width of the code 'if (' is exactly one   * With an indentation size of 4, the width of the code 'if (' is exactly one
Line 147  less(int a, int b)
Line 147  less(int a, int b)
  * XXX: This is unexpected since this creates the exact ambiguity that the   * XXX: This is unexpected since this creates the exact ambiguity that the
  * option '-eei' is supposed to prevent.   * option '-eei' is supposed to prevent.
  */   */
 #indent run -eei -i4 -nlp  //indent run -eei -i4 -nlp
 {  {
     if (a      if (a
         && b)          && b)
         stmt();          stmt();
 }  }
 #indent end  //indent end
Legend:
Removed from v.1.7  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.8
CVSweb <webmaster@jp.NetBSD.org>